Which of the following items must be included on an equipment time card for it to be admissible evidence in a court of law?

For an equipment time card to be admissible evidence in a court of law, it is essential to include the hours distributed by work activities performed. This detail provides a clear understanding of how the equipment was utilized through different tasks on the project. It helps establish a context for the labor and resources involved, thereby supporting claims regarding the efficiency and productivity of the labor force.

Including the distribution of hours by activities adds specificity, allowing for a better assessment of labor costs and project timelines, which are critical factors in many legal disputes related to construction and contract compliance. Such detailed documentation can aid in defending against claims or verifying compliance with contract stipulations, making it an essential aspect of time card records in legal contexts.

On the other hand, while equipment type and make, hours worked for each employee, and materials used on site may all be important for different reasons, they do not provide the same direct correlation between the hours worked and the specific activities undertaken, which is vital for legal admissibility regarding evidence of work performed.