Which project delivery system best supports the Fast-Track method in construction?

The Design-Build project delivery system is the best support for the Fast-Track method in construction due to its inherent characteristics that facilitate overlapping phases of design and construction. In the Design-Build approach, a single entity is responsible for both design and construction, which enables a more streamlined communication process and faster decision-making.

This integration allows for construction to begin before the complete design is finalized, which is the essence of Fast-Track scheduling. As a result, overlapping design and construction activities can significantly reduce the overall project timeline, which is critical in situations where time is of the essence.

Moreover, the collaborative nature of Design-Build encourages innovation and efficiency, allowing teams to address potential issues early in the process. This adaptability ensures that projects can keep moving forward without waiting for sequential steps to be completed, thus enhancing the benefits of the Fast-Track approach.

In contrast, other project delivery systems, such as Design-Bid-Build, typically involve a more linear process and separate contracts for design and construction, which can lead to delays. Construction Management at Risk, while it can allow some overlap, often maintains more separation between design and construction than Design-Build. The Traditional Method also follows a sequential flow that does not align well with Fast-