How often should time be distributed to construction activities on time cards for admissible evidence in court?

Distributing time to construction activities on time cards twice a day is considered best practice for ensuring admissible evidence in court. This frequency provides a more accurate and detailed account of the time spent on various tasks, making it easier to demonstrate diligence and accountability in project work.

When time is recorded twice a day, it reduces the potential for errors or memory lapses that can occur if employees wait until the end of the week or day to document their hours. This practice supports clear record-keeping, which is critical in legal situations where precise timelines and labor allocation may be scrutinized. By confirming time entries more regularly, it bolsters the credibility of the records as reliable evidence if disputes arise or if a court needs to assess the work done and associated costs.

Less frequent recording, such as once a day or at the end of the week, can increase the potential for inaccuracies that might weaken the integrity of the documentation. In contrast, capturing this information twice a day aligns with best practices that emphasize transparency and accountability in reporting labor hours within construction projects.